The evolution of community medicine: Part 5, The poor law and the national health
digital file Colour Sound 1984 21:29
Video not currently available. Get in touch to discuss viewing this film
Summary: The fifth in an 8-part series of short lectures by Sidney Chave from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. The series charts the rise of the Public Health Movement and the different ways this initial reform evolved into community medicine. This part looks at the changing face of the Poor Law. 4 segments.
Title number: 18291
LSA ID: LSA/21448
Description: Segment 1 Chave, seated, speaks to the camera. He says how the Poor Law of 1834 had become outdated and defective - financial assistance for the poor was not equally distributed by the various Boards of Guardians appointed in different regions. For instance, some would help out the elderly while others wouldn't. Poor Law infirmaries and hospitals brought stigma to patients as to be admitted to the infirmary, in particular, meant to be classified as a pauper. In 1905, the Balfour Government set up the Royal Commission on the Poor Law and Relief of Distress, it was a commission with 18 distinguished members, the like of which had not been seen before in England. Portraits of Beatrice Webb and Sidney Webb are shown - they were a partnership which was to do much for the development of social policy, social enquiry, social action and social science. The Royal Commission initially agreed on one thing: to do away with the Boards of Guardians. Time start: 00:00:00:00 Time end: 00:05:08:17 Length: 00:05:08:17 Segment 2 Chave continues to describe the results of the Royal Commission. The Majority Report of the Commission proposed that the work previously done by the Boards of Guardians should be passed onto the local authorities who should set up Public Assistant Committees to administer public assistance to the needy. The Minority Report was more radical, suggesting the Poor Law be abolished entirely. They also suggested that a National Medical Service be set up. In 1909, Prime Minister Campbell-Bennerman read the two reports and was unable to make a decision as to which one to support. This lack of decision spanned 20 years with subsequent Prime Ministers also unable to choose between the two reports until finally the Majority Report was brought into action. Time start: 00:05:08:17 Time end: 00:09:28:17 Length: 00:04:20:00 Segment 3 Chave discusses old age pensions which were introduced in England in 1908. Although the yearly sum of -
Credits: Presented by Dr Sidney Chave, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. Produced by John Winn and Paul Wilks. Edited by David Crawford.
Further information: This video is one of more than 120 titles, originally broadcast on Channel 7 of the ILEA closed-circuit television network, given to Wellcome Trust from the University of London Audio-Visual Centre shortly after it closed in the late 1980s. Although some of these programmes might now seem rather out-dated, they probably represent the largest and most diversified body of medical video produced in any British university at this time, and give a comprehensive and fascinating view of the state of medical and surgical research and practice in the 1970s and 1980s, thus constituting a contemporary medical-historical archive of great interest. The lectures mostly take place in a small and intimate studio setting and are often face-to-face. The lecturers use a wide variety of resources to illustrate their points, including film clips, slides, graphs, animated diagrams, charts and tables as well as 3-dimensional models and display boards with movable pieces. Some of the lecturers are telegenic while some are clearly less comfortable about being recorded all are experts in their field and show great enthusiasm to share both the latest research and the historical context of their specialist areas.
Keywords: Poor laws; Community Medicine; Community Medicine -- history; National Health Programs; Public Health; Physicians; History of Medicine;
Locations: United Kingdom; England; London; University of London
Related
Comments